In yesterday's Guardian art critic Jonathan Jones dismisses photography as "not art", while - to our relief - Sean O'Hagan argues against this idea. Go and have a look for yourselves (warning: the first article is extremely annoying).
So "photography will never be art" vs "If anything is anachronistic, it’s the “photography is not art” debate"
It's a bit sad this debate is still around in 2014...
So "photography will never be art" vs "If anything is anachronistic, it’s the “photography is not art” debate"
It's a bit sad this debate is still around in 2014...